Carbon Targets

At their most basic, carbon targets are the carbon reduction goals set by organisations. These specific goals are often guided by regulatory requirements and standardised carbon reduction frameworks such as Science Based Targets (SBTs) and Net Zero Targets. Implementing either one of these guidelines follows a similar process and the main difference between the two lies in the magnitude of the intended results.

Science Based Targets

SBTs are emissions reduction targets that are based on the best available science, designed to keep global warming within safe limits and meet collective sustainability goals. SBTs:

  • Align with the latest scientific understanding of what is needed to limit global warming to safe levels

  • Provide a clear and ambitious goal for companies and governments to work towards

  • Can help to build a sense of urgency and momentum for action on climate change

However, SBTs:

  • May be difficult to implement, especially for organisations with highly polluting operations

  • May be challenging for businesses with high economic growth plans

  • May not be supported by government policies and regulations in some countries

Net Zero

Net Zero targets are considered to be more ambitious as they require organisations to both offset their emissions and actively work to reduce them as much as possible. Net Zero Targets:

  • Help limit global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that can be absorbed by natural sinks

  • Can drive innovation and investment in clean energy and low-carbon technologies

  • Can increase the resilience of businesses and communities to the impacts of climate change

However, Net Zero Targets:

  • May be too ambitious for organisations with limited resources

  • Can place a burden on businesses and consumers, leading to higher costs and lower economic growth

  • May be challenging for businesses with high economic growth plans

Another way?

Carbon targets are an essential part of any organisation's efforts to manage and reduce their carbon emissions, and both Net Zero and SBTs are effective strategies for achieving these goals.

Net Zero and SBTs are generally understood as “absolute” emission targets, which means they are based on reducing emissions by a set amount. However, there are other approaches to setting carbon targets that may be more realistic based on your organisation’s capabilities, including:

  • Intensity-based Targets: Setting targets based on the emissions intensity of an organisation’s operations. For example:

    • Emissions per unit of revenue

    • Emissions per unit of production

  • Bespoke Targets: Defining any type of target(s) based on your organisation’s own priorities. Bespoke targets can be more ambitious than Net Zero and SBTs in some areas while allowing for more gradual and sustainable carbon reductions in others. Achievable targets make it easier to meet your goals and adjust these according to your progress. Because bespoke targets are not necessarily tied to externally defined parameters, this flexible approach allows you to:

    • Prioritise the most important emission reductions and plan carbon management accordingly

    • Disaggregate your emissions and focus on portions at a time:

      • Specific areas such as Transport, Electricity and Waste

      • Specific Scopes and combinations of these (eg “just” Scopes 1 and 2 or “only” Scope 3)

    • Set any specific reduction percentage across specific areas, scopes, and/or overall

    • Plan your carbon management according to the specific targets you want to set

    These bespoke targets are much liklier to be acheivable as they are instrinsically tied to what is possible for your organisation and therefore inherenetly more realistic.

Previous
Previous

Carbon Reduction

Next
Next

Good Governance